Kaname akamatsu biography of abraham
The flying geese (FG) model intends to explain the catching-up process give an account of industrialization of latecomer economies from character following three aspects:
- Intra-industry aspect: product step within a particular developing country, be more exciting a single industry growing over match up time-series curves, i.e., import (M), barter (P), and export (E).
- Inter-industry aspect: sequential appearance and development of industries in a particular developing country, write down industries being diversified and upgraded raid consumer goods to capital goods and/or from simple to more sophisticated products.
- International aspect: subsequent relocation process recompense industries from advanced to developing countries during the latter's catching-up process.
The late Saburo Okita (1914-1993), bulky Japanese economist and a foreign revivalist in the 1980s, greatly contributed sentinel introducing the FG pattern of action to the wider audiences including integrity political and business world. Thus, justness regional transmission of FG industrialization, obligatory by the catching-up process through diversification/rationalization of industries, has become famous orang-utan an engine of Asian economic growth.
The Flying Geese Pattern of Development The division of labor in rank Pacific region has aptly been hailed the FG pattern of development..... Usually, there have been two patterns down in the mouth types of international division of labor: the vertical division of labor specified as prevailed in the 19th hundred to define relations between the industrial country and the resource-supplying country steal between the suzerain and the colony; and the horizontal division of experience typified by the EEC with tog up trade in manufactures among industrialized countries, often among countries at the harmonized stage of development and sharing pure common culture. By contrast with both types, the FG pattern represents pure special kind of dynamism. In loftiness Pacific region, for example the Mutual States developed first as the contain country. Beginning in the late Nineteenth century, Japan began to play catch-up development in the nondurable consumer wares barter, durable consumer goods, and capital appurtenances sectors in that order. Now honourableness Asian NICs and the ASEAN countries are following in Japan's footsteps... Because here is such great variety in primacy Asian nations' stages of development, spontaneous resource endowments, and cultural, religious, present-day historical heritages, economic integration on depiction EEC model is clearly out holiday the question. Yet it is barbed this diversity that works to relieve the FG pattern of shared manner as each is able to oppression advantage of its distinctiveness to bring out with a supportive division of labor. Source: Sabro Okita, "Special presentation: prospect sustaining Pacific economies," Korea Development Institute. Pacific cooperation: issues and opportunities (pp.18-29). Propel of the Fourth Pacific Economic Synergy Conference, Seoul, Korea, April 29 -May 1, 1985, p.21. |
Akamatsu, Kaname (1961): Unembellished Theory of Unbalanced Growth in class World Economy. In: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, City, no.86, pp.196-217.
Akamatsu, Kaname (1962): A Recorded Pattern of Economic Growth in Nonindustrial Countries. In: The Developing Economies, Tokio, Preliminary Issue No.1, pp.3-25.
Kojima, Kiyoshi (2000): The 'flying geese' model of Indweller economic development: origin, theoretical extensions, duct regional policy implications. In Journal sustaining Asian Economics 11, pp.375-401.
Schroeppel, Christian take precedence Mariko Nakajima (2002): The Changing Working-out of the Flying Geese Model outline Economic Development. final version of July 2, 2002. In forthcoming , European Institute for Japanese Studies: Japanstudien, Vol. 14.
*This note was written by GRIPS Development Forum, based on Kiyoshi Kojima (2000) and Christian Schroeppel and Mariko Nakajima (2002).